Art & Archives, Getty Research Institute, Paintings, Photographs, Film, and Video

Listening to Edward Hopper’s Silence

How do you make a movie about Edward Hopper? The artist—famous for his haunting and enigmatic paintings such as Nighthawks and New York Movie—was conspicuously taciturn, speaking little about his work, giving few interviews, and keeping to a small circle closely monitored by his protective wife, Jo. When the Academy of Arts and Letters awarded Hopper its gold medal for painting, he gave a one-word speech: “Thanks.” Upon Hopper’s death in 1967, eight people came to his funeral.


Edward Hopper, Arnold Newman, 1941. Gelatin silver print, 36.7 x 45.2 cm (14 7/16 x 17 13/16 in.). Gift of Nina and Leo Pircher. © Estate of Arnold Newman

Artist and author Brian O’Doherty, a longtime friend of Hopper’s, was one of those eight. So when he set out to make a documentary about the artist, he had no desire to transgress Hopper’s silence. Instead, he embraced it. The result was the 1981 film Hopper’s Silence, a meditative visual essay that explores the majestic quiet that characterizes the characters, rooms, and streets in Hopper’s paintings, as well as the artist himself.

A scholar-in-residence at the Getty Research Institute this past spring, O’Doherty recently screened and discussed Hopper’s Silence and revealed its improbable origins in 1961, when O’Doherty found the artist’s name in the phone book and called to arrange a half-hour TV interview.

If Hopper had secrets, though, he wasn’t giving them away in any interview.

O’Doherty: “Are your paintings reflective of the isolation of modern life?”
Hopper: “It may be true. It may not be true.”

O’Doherty: “What do you think of your teacher, Robert Henri?”
Hopper: “I think he was moderately good.”

O’Doherty: “What draws you to the dark landscapes you paint?”
Hopper: “I suppose it’s just me.”

Hopper’s characters are intensely private, too. Not a single one speaks. Gazes often point down or into a vague distance. Windows abound, highlighting this privacy by inviting us to violate it—try it yourself in Night Windows or Morning in a City.

So who was this man? An old-fashioned modern painter, as one friend called him? A representational Rothko? An everyman with an eye? Yes, but there was more. His goal was to paint things that could not exist at the same time: inside and outside, being there and not being there. “How do you know what an empty room looks like,” asked Hopper in reference to Sun in an Empty Room, “if no one’s there?”

And although Hopper was enveloped by silence, it was a rich silence. “His silence was half process, half paralysis,” said O’Doherty after the screening. “He was mysterious even to himself. And he plumbed the sense of mystery he found in himself.” This mystery is why an artist once dismissed as an “American scene painter” (he hated the term) continues to call to us—silently.

Brian O'Doherty at the podium in the Museum Lecture Hall

Brian O'Doherty at the podium in the Museum Lecture Hall

Tagged , , , , : . Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  1. Hank Bunker
    Posted July 9, 2010 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for the Hopper post. I love what you say about his depicting what is both present and absent at the same time. Reminds me of Mark Strand’s line about Hopper: “We feel the presence of what is hidden, of what surely exists but is not revealed.” Something about the solitude, and the quietude, in his work that clears the space needed for this absent presence to assert itself. What beauty.


    • Posted July 9, 2010 at 4:57 pm | Permalink

      Thanks, Hank, for your comment — the quote you shared is beautiful. Although I cannot take credit for O’Doherty’s brilliant descriptions of Hopper, I’m delighted to be able to share them.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>


  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Tumblr

    • photo from Tumblr



      Winter is coming. All men must die. And Game of Thrones is back! Stay tuned each week as we unpack Sunday’s episodes through masterpieces.

      Winter is coming indeed! A snowy forecast has just been resurrected thanks to a please-touch-me-and-cut-my-hair lady in red. The epic line “I drink and I know things” provides especially good wisdom for how to tame two dragons

      Several characters went at it this week: a soldier and a friar exchanged heated remarks in the presence of an armed peace mob, a girl with no name and another not-so-kind girl went stick to stick, a crow and a giant went crossbow to stone wall, a first-born son stabbed his father, starving hounds and a new mother went canines to flesh, and two brothers duked it out on a swinging bridge (one fell). Plus, the three-eyed raven (who sits in a tree) taught a forgotten character how to look into the past.

      To make our Game of Thrones posts more international, we’ll feature an image from our Global Middle Ages exhibition and pick “wildcard” images from other collections around the world.

      This week’s pick from the Getty’s Traversing the Globe exhibition comes from @lacma (because we love dragons). The wildcard images were selected from the British Museum (more dragons), the Morgan Library (giants!), and the Museo del Prado (hounds).

      Dive deeper with featurettes connecting the making of medieval manuscripts to the making of fantasy TV. 


      #DesigningGoT - Live Stream May 4 at 7 PM PST

      Michele Clapton, costume designer for the first five seasons of Game of Thrones, joins Deborah Landis, director of the Copley Center for Costume Design at UCLA, and Bryan C. Keene, assistant curator of manuscripts at the Getty, to discuss the series’ medieval aesthetic and the visual sources for her designs.

      Tune in to the live stream here.


  • Flickr