Exhibitions and Installations, J. Paul Getty Museum

Actor Peter Weller Discusses Renaissance Florence (and Answers Your Questions!)

Peter Weller in Padua

Actor Peter Weller in Padua, Italy

Actor and director Peter Weller is known for his many film and television roles, most famously Robocop in Paul Verhoeven’s campy classic. However, Weller’s interests go far beyond the camera—he is a scholar of Italian Renaissance art who is completing his PhD at UCLA.

This Thursday, Weller visits the Getty Center to discuss the dynamic artistic, political, economic, and religious climate that flourished in early Renaissance Florence. We’re collecting questions for Weller via Twitter using the hashtag #AskWeller. He’ll answer several of the questions in his conversation with Christine Sciacca, organizer of the exhibition Florence at the Dawn of the Renaissance: Painting and Illumination, 1300–1350.

We asked Weller a few introductory questions about his work as an art historian, and we look forward to receiving your questions as well!

What led you to study Renaissance art?
The film arts, my day gig. Mike Nichols, a mentor, owns a Picasso, and my friend Ali MacGraw took me to MoMA’s exhibition in 1979 celebrating the sending of Picasso’s Guernica to Spain. Subsequently I was put in touch with Cory Brennan, professor of classics at Rutgers, when he was at the American Academy in Rome and I was shooting there; as well as Maria Conelli, now head of Brooklyn College, and Walter Liedtke of European paintings at the Met. All of these folk put me on the track of antique and medieval/Renaissance/baroque art history.

What makes the study of Florence during the early Renaissance so fascinating to you?
The 14th century brings Giotto, Dante, the Black Death—and the question of whether this epic disaster stalled the evolution of painting technique—as well as the marked intersection of text and pictorial arts.

What are you currently studying?
I am finishing my dissertation, Alberti Before Florence: Sources Informing “De Pictura”, to be filed in May 2013, as well as refining a paper on possible Franciscan influence on a few works by Antonello da Messina.

Is there a little-known figure during this time who had a large influence on art, such as a wealthy patron?
If there is a 14th-century “lesser-known” entity to which more focus might be attended, I would say it is the confluence of Petrarch, antiquarianism, humanism, and the Veronese painter Altichiero that converges in Padua in the late 14th century; and the subsequent fallout of that coalescence on Florentine art. But you have to read my dissertation for the full review.

Any interesting anecdotes about the community of artists working in Florence in the 1300s?
The most interesting anomaly, I find, is that as much as 21st-century scholarship has debunked the Jacob Burkhardtian notion of the Renaissance being sort of an “explosion” or at least a “breakpoint” instead of a sophisticated evolution, no one has yet to explain the breakthrough genius of naturalism that jumped out of the early 14th century in Donatello. We can speak all we want about the evolution of the mathematical or fixed perspective of Brunelleschi, and the realism of Masaccio and Ghiberti, and still not arrive at the wonder of Donatello in all three media of wood, stone, and bronze.

How did the city planning and architecture of Florence influence the art that was created there?
Excellent question; I am still not sure whether Brunelleschi went to Rome or simply observed the baptisteries of Padua and Florence and Church of San Miniato for his canon to design the Innocenti and old sacristy of San Lorenzo. Certainly his resolution to invoke antique ratio and proportion in San Lorenzo and Santo Spirito pointed to the architectural perfection of painting proportion as well ([such as we see in the works of] Ucello and Piero della Francesca); but all of this still doesn’t EXPLAIN the genius of Donatello!

Florence at the Dawn of the Renaissance: Painting and Illumination, 1300–1350 is on view through February 10, 2013.

Tagged , , , , , , , , , , Bookmark the permalink. Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.

One Comment

  1. gina tanner
    Posted August 18, 2013 at 4:00 pm | Permalink

    would Peter Weller consider giving a tour of Florence in 2014

One Trackback

Post a Comment

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

  • Facebook

  • Twitter

  • Tumblr

    • photo from Tumblr

      A Chat with Photographer Tomoko Sawada

      A conversation about Japanese matchmaking traditions, self-portraiture, clothes, and identity.

      When did you start photographing yourself?
      I began making self-portraits when I was 19. It was an assignment for a photography class. I can’t even explain in Japanese why I liked them so much. It was instinctual. It’s as if I knew that this was going to be my style, that this is what I wanted to do. And I’m still doing it because I love the self-portrait, but I don’t know why. 

      What themes are you exploring in your work?
      I’m interested in the relationship between inside and outside. If you wear a sexy dress or if you wear kids clothes or casual clothes, people treat you differently. Even though you are you no matter what you wear. It’s that relationship that makes me think. 

      My new work is from when I was living in New York. When I was in New York, people didn’t think I was Japanese. Sometimes they thought I was Korean or Chines or Mongolian. Even Singaporean. It was funny, when I would go to the Japanese market, they would speak to me in English. When I went to the Korean market, they would speak to me in English again. I don’t seem to look Japanese outside of Japan. I was surprised because I think I look totally Japanese. It’s funny that people’s points of view are totally different.

      Could you talk a little about OMIAI, the series that represents a traditional Japanese matchmaking technique.
      OMIAI is a tradition that is somehow still working today. Usually, there is a matchmaker and photographs are exchanged before meeting. If both sides are interested, they can meet for lunch or dinner accompanied by their parents and steps for marriage proceed from there. In the old days, some people chose their marriage partner just through photographs, without even meeting each other. 

      When OMIAI was exhibited in Japan I saw people making various comments in from of the work. People would say things like, “she looks like a good cook; surely she would prepare delicious meals every day,” or “ this girl could be a perfect bride for my son,” or “I can tell she would not be a good housewife,” or “she’s such a graceful girl; she must be the daughter of a decent family.” Comments like that. 

      What was the process of making that work?
      I gained 10 pounds before I started taking the pictures, and in six months I lost forty pounds, because I wanted to look different in each photo. I wanted to change the way my legs looked. 

      Every weekend I went to the hair salon and put on a kimono. Then I went to the photo studio on the street in Japan. I would take a picture and then change my clothes to western dress. Then I would go to the studio again the next weekend. 

      Did you tell the photographer how you wanted it done?
      I told him I was an artist and wanted to make photographs with him. I told him to think that each weekend new girls would show up to make the OMIAI. I didn’t want him to think of me as the same girl who came every weekend. He understood the concept. 

      We had fun. While he was taking pictures, his wife would tell me how to lose weight. She gave me many tips.

      Tomoko Sawada’s work is on view at the Getty until February 21, 2016 in “The Younger Generation: Contemporary Japanese Photography”


  • Flickr